Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules
Date: 2006-06-01 11:46:56
Message-ID: 200606010746.56867.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Wednesday 31 May 2006 13:24, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:14:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Is it worth adding a module name to the magic block, or should we just
> > leave well enough alone? It's certainly not something foreseen as part
> > of the purpose of that block. In the absence of some fairly concrete
> > ideas what to do with it, I'm probably going to vote keep-it-simple.
>
> I actually considered it while writing the patch but decided against
> given the general tendancy against putting extra info into the modules
> in general...
>
> Personally I think it's a good idea, except: where is this info going
> to be displayed or used?
>

Marko's suggestion on producing a list of installed modules comes to mind, and
I suspect tools like pgadmin or ppa will want to be able to show this
information.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tzahi Fadida 2006-06-01 12:33:50 CTID issues and a soc student in need of help
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-06-01 10:53:05 Re: session id and global storage

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-06-01 13:04:36 Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS
Previous Message Joachim Wieland 2006-06-01 08:25:17 TODO-Item: full timezone names