Re: pg_proc probin misuse

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>, James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_proc probin misuse
Date: 2006-05-29 21:50:05
Message-ID: 200605292150.k4TLo5O12229@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Is there a TODO here?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> writes:
> >> If it were really expensive to derive bytecode from source text
> >> then maybe it'd make sense to do what you're doing, but surely that's
> >> not all that expensive. Everyone else manages to parse prosrc on the
> >> fly and cache the result in memory; why isn't plpython doing that?
>
> > It depends on the number of imported modules in the function. If it
> > imports a lot of modules, it can take some time to compile a python
> > function (especially if the modules have some initialisation code which
> > must be run on import).
>
> Surely the initialization code would have to be run anyway ... and if
> the function does import a pile of modules, do you really want to cache
> all that in its pg_proc entry? What happens if some of the modules get
> updated later?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PFC 2006-05-29 22:10:43 Re: pg_proc probin misuse
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-29 21:47:00 psql strings and ''