Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Mention pg_dump version portability

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mention pg_dump version portability
Date: 2006-05-15 20:23:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 12:21:06PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have applied this patch that mentions pg_dump portability to 8.1.X and

Would it be worth recommending using the custom format over plain? I see
plenty of issues with incompatabilities in the plain version, but I
don't think I've ever seen problem with the custom format (though this
could just be because everyone uses the default...)
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software    work: 512-231-6117
vcard:       cell: 512-569-9461

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-05-15 23:43:20
Subject: Re: Mention pg_dump version portability
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-05-13 16:21:06
Subject: Mention pg_dump version portability

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2006-05-15 20:33:10
Subject: Re: Iterating generator from C (PostgreSQL's pl/python RETUN
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-05-15 20:14:36
Subject: Re: Compression and on-disk sorting

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group