Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set via
Date: 2006-05-01 02:58:39
Message-ID: 200605010258.k412wds12624@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Documentation added, patch attached and applied. Thanks.
>
> I just got around to reading this patch. Why is the syntax GRANT CONNECTION
> and not GRANT CONNECT? Privilege names are generally verbs not nouns.
> Unless someone can point to a good reason for CONNECTION, I'm going to
> change it.

Sounds good, hit the docs too, thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Brant 2006-05-01 17:15:25 Re: pgstat: remove delayed destroy / pipe:
Previous Message Gevik Babakhani 2006-04-30 22:17:56 Re: Patch for %Allow per-database permissions to be set