| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" |
| Date: | 2006-04-26 18:52:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20060426185240.GE2302@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > TRUNCATE doesn't follow MVCC...
> >
> > We can certainly talk about fixing that. (And CLUSTER at the same time,
> > I think.)
>
> The issue is that it seems to be intractable to retain MVCC-ness *and*
> provide the performance savings TRUNCATE gives. If you can solve that
> problem then we could get rid of TRUNCATE and implement
> DELETE-without-WHERE using that magic.
Doh, sorry, I was thinking in CLUSTER :-(
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-26 19:04:51 | Re: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission" |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-04-26 18:33:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Enhanced containment selectivity function |