On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:20:28PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Hi Markus,
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:53:34AM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> > Are there any rough estimates when this will get into mainline kernel
> > (if you intend to submit)?
> I'm not quite sure :)
> The patch itself has been pretty stable. To get it accepted, we must
> back it by good benchmarking results for some important applications.
> I have confirmed that file service via FTP/HTTP/NFS can more or less
> benefit from it. However, database services have not been touched yet.
> Oracle/DB2 seem to bypass the readahead code route, while postgresql
> relies totally on kernel readahead logic. So if postgresql is proved
> to work well with this patch, it will have good opportunity to go into
> mainline :)
IIRC Mark from OSDL said he'd try testing this when he gets a chance,
but you could also try running dbt2 and dbt3 against it.
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Mikael Carneholm||Date: 2006-04-21 21:20:58|
|Subject: Re: Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stumph||Date: 2006-04-21 18:24:15|
|Subject: Worsening performance with 7.4 on flash-based system|