Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Index scan startup time

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Index scan startup time
Date: 2006-03-30 11:59:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
[Apologies if this already went through.  I don't see it in the archives.]

Normally one expects that an index scan would have a startup time of nearly 
zero.  Can anyone explain this:

EXPLAIN ANALYZE select activity_id from activity where state in (10000, 10001) 
order by activity_id limit 100;


Limit  (cost=0.00..622.72 rows=100 width=8) (actual 
time=207356.054..207356.876 rows=100 loops=1)
  ->  Index Scan using activity_pk on activity  (cost=0.00..40717259.91 
rows=6538650 width=8) (actual time=207356.050..207356.722 rows=100 loops=1)
        Filter: ((state = 10000) OR (state = 10001))
Total runtime: 207357.000 ms

The table has seen VACUUM FULL and REINDEX before this.

The plan choice and the statistics look right, but why does it take 3 minutes 
before doing anything?  Or is the measurement of the actual start time 
inaccurate?  This is quite reproducible, so it's not just a case of a 
temporary I/O bottleneck, say.

(PostgreSQL 8.0.3)

Peter Eisentraut


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Steinar H. GundersonDate: 2006-03-30 12:02:06
Subject: Re: Index scan startup time
Previous:From: Mattias KregertDate: 2006-03-30 09:16:34
Subject: Automatic tuning of postgresql.conf parameters?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group