Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Dead Space Map

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dead Space Map
Date: 2006-02-28 14:00:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:52:24AM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> WHY does vacuum need to be a tranasction ? I thought it was a programmer
> workload optimisation (aka. lazyness :) ) to require ordinary lazy
> vacuum to be in transaction.
> There is no fundamental reason, why vacuum needs to run in a transaction
> itselt.

AIUI, vacuum needs to take locks on tables and possibly wait on other
transactions to complete. Similarly, other transactions may need to
wait on the vacuum (DDL statements). The mechanism in postgres to clean
up locks on crash and handle deadlock detection (I think) requires
everybody to be running in a transaction, so vacuum does too...

At least, that's what I thought,

Have a nice day,
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-02-28 14:44:53
Subject: Re: character encoding in StartupMessage
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2006-02-28 13:51:42
Subject: Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group