| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance |
| Date: | 2006-02-27 21:38:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20060227213815.GN82012@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:24:05AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> >How fine-grained do we want to get on namespaces? I'd be slightly more
> >inclined to have pg_info or maybe pg_utils as a place to stash not only
> >extra system views but other utility stuff that we want to ship but is
> >essentially droppable.
>
> AFAIK, none of the contributors to newsysviews has any attachment to any
> particular name. I'd personally prefer to go with your suggestion of a
> more generic schema name.
Agreed. pg_info or pg_util sound good. Since there's a fairly large
number of views I don't know if it's worth having both pg_info and
pg_util.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-02-27 21:56:31 | Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance |
| Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-02-27 20:38:23 | Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf .... |