Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
Date: 2006-02-27 21:38:15
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:24:05AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andrew,
> >How fine-grained do we want to get on namespaces? I'd be slightly more 
> >inclined to have pg_info or maybe pg_utils as a place to stash not only 
> >extra system views but other utility stuff that we want to ship but is 
> >essentially droppable.
> AFAIK, none of the contributors to newsysviews has any attachment to any 
> particular name.  I'd personally prefer to go with your suggestion of a 
> more generic schema name.

Agreed. pg_info or pg_util sound good. Since there's a fairly large
number of views I don't know if it's worth having both pg_info and
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software    work: 512-231-6117
vcard:       cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-02-27 21:56:31
Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
Previous:From: Mark WoodwardDate: 2006-02-27 20:38:23
Subject: Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group