From: | James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ScanDirections |
Date: | 2006-02-20 02:46:18 |
Message-ID: | 20060220024618.GD68783@lit.jwp.name |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:04:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name> writes:
> > Small patch that makes ScanDirection a char(f|b|n) instead of a int or
> > long or whatever enum makes it.
>
> Why is this a good idea?
A more appropriately sized variable for the data that it will be holding?
Certainly not a stunning improvement considering that it's only three bytes.
> It strikes me as likely to break things, without really buying anything.
I tried to be careful and track everything down. However, I imagine I could
have easily missed something, so I understand that concern.
In any case, some parts of the patch merely makes some code make use of the
sdir.h macros instead of depending on -1/0/1--heapam in particular. At least
those portions should be applied, no?
--
Regards, James William Pye
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-20 02:51:43 | Re: ScanDirections |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-20 02:40:46 | WIP: further sorting speedup |