Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem
Date: 2006-02-12 23:45:12
Message-ID: 200602122345.k1CNjCD12720@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I have applied the following patch for 8.2. I have not applied to 8.1.X
> > because it is a behavior change.
>
> This patch broke the regression tests. It seems to change the C-locale
> behavior on many platforms.

Oh, so C locale has "" for thousands_sep? Hmm. So there is no way to
disinguish "" as "don't have" from "" as "don't want". Will revert.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-02-12 23:51:00 Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-12 23:43:11 Re: Why does an ON SELECT rule have to be named "_RETURN"?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-12 23:50:12 Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-12 23:24:52 Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem