| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multiple logical databases |
| Date: | 2006-02-02 16:21:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20060202162121.GD5173@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Mark Woodward wrote:
> Seriously? No use at all? You don't see any purpose in controlling and
> managing multiple postgresql postmaster processes from one central point?
I'd rather spend effort in fixing the problems that arise from big
databases; for example Hannu's patch for concurrent vacuum attacks one
of the problems that IMHO are important. More elaborate partitioning
does too.
Anyway, if you're very excited about it, I don't think it's impossible
to code a super-postmaster that would redirect a client to the real
postmaster. I even think it can be done without modifying the regular
postmaster.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2006-02-02 17:40:29 | Re: Multiple logical databases |
| Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2006-02-02 16:14:58 | streamlined standby process |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2006-02-02 17:40:29 | Re: Multiple logical databases |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2006-02-02 16:12:47 | Re: Multiple logical databases |