Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: A note about testing EXEC_BACKEND on recent Linuxen

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A note about testing EXEC_BACKEND on recent Linuxen
Date: 2006-02-01 20:14:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > FYI, the shared memory address was originally relocatable by using
> > offsets to address it from the child, but now that we use fork() on
> > Unix, it isn't an issue, and Win32 seems to be OK.
> In the worst case we could go back to using offsets everywhere, but I'm
> really reluctant to do that for reasons of code clarity and reliability.
> The main problem with it is that you have to explicitly cast to and from
> the correct pointer type, which is not only ugly but completely defeats
> any chance of the compiler catching wrong-type errors.

As I remember, the offsets also had a performance and/or storage impact
we don't want either.

> What I am seeing on Fedora 4 (I suppose it's common to most recent Linux
> versions) is that the system preferentially maps the shared memory
> segment just below the stack, which is good from the point of view of
> preserving maximum address space for the heap, but not so great if stack
> size changes or the stack moves a bit.  It'd be possible to get a little
> more flexibility by requesting a non-default attach location for the
> postmaster's initial shmat call.  I'm not interested in getting into
> that if we don't absolutely have to, but it might be the best answer if
> we find ourselves seeing similar issues on specific platforms (ie
> Windows) in the future.


  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2006-02-01 20:50:25
Subject: Re: autovacuum
Previous:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2006-02-01 19:51:36
Subject: Re: autovacuum

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group