| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |
| Date: | 2006-01-16 20:49:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20060116204955.GC32100@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On 1/16/06, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> what about lower the context part of the messages for plpgsql
> functions? that seems debug info for me... just an idea ;)
>
> pruebas=# select prueba();
> ERROR: new row for relation "foo" violates check constraint "foo_fld_check"
> CONTEXT: SQL statement "insert into foo values (-1)"
> PL/pgSQL function "prueba" line 2 at SQL statement
It's not debug info in the sense of the DEBUG error levels. These are
meant as debug info of the server itself, like, say, a transaction
started. The CONTEXT line is exactly that, context information.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre
"World domination is proceeding according to plan" (Andrew Morton)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 20:52:01 | Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? |
| Previous Message | Jonathan Gardner | 2006-01-16 20:45:37 | Re: source documentation tool doxygen |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-01-16 20:59:45 | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-01-16 20:44:25 | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |