Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Date: 2006-01-04 04:24:09
Message-ID: 200601040424.k044O9k13992@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > > > Basically meaning your idea of update while
> > > > EXCLUSIVE/PRESERVE/STABLE is happening is never going to be
> > > > implemented because it is just too hard to do, and too prone to
> > > > error.
> > >
> > > What I figured. Never hurts to ask though. :):)
> >
> > Actually, it does hurt because it generates discussion volume for no
> > purpose.
>
> Zowie!!
>
> Surely you didn't mean that the way it sounded?

Actually, I did. Throwing out random ideas that have little useful
purpose and just confuse the discussion is not helpful.

"Wouldn't it be nice if PostgreSQL allowed commands to be typed
backwards so people could program by looking at the screen through a
mirror" is not helpful.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-04 04:32:01 Re: TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-04 04:17:16 Re: Deferrable UNIQUE INDEX?