Re: TODO item: list prepared queries

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO item: list prepared queries
Date: 2005-12-31 16:50:46
Message-ID: 200512311650.jBVGokx22490@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have applied the following patch to CVS HEAD to mark client-side
> > prepare/bind/execute statements with "[client]" so they can be easily
> > distinguished from SQL commands.
>
> There is no such thing as a "client-side prepare/bind/execute"
> statement. The distinction is between SQL-level and protocol-level
> prepared queries. "[client]" seems wrong; perhaps "[protocol]" could be
> used instead?

Agreed. I never liked "client" either. It got me confused. I have
changed it to protocol; patch attached.

> (I'm not thrilled by the idea of prefixing the statement log with
> "[...]" in any case: it makes it more difficult to determine the actual
> query string submitted by the user. However I can't see a better
> alternative...)

Yep.

> > I hesitate to apply this logging change to 8.1.X.
>
> I don't see any reason to do that -- this is not a bug fix. Furthermore,
> there are backward-compatibility concerns.

Right.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 3.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-31 19:43:26 Re: TODO item: list prepared queries
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-12-31 16:18:29 LDAP auth