On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 06:35:24PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > ?hel kenal p?eval, N, 2005-12-22 kell 18:19, kirjutas Bruce Momjian:
> > I guess he rather wants to have dont-save-but-execute-immediately
> > pl/pgsql code.
> > could this perhaps be solved by having temporary functions, similar to
> > postgresql's temporary tables ?
> I am thinking they want the ability to sit at a prompt and type stuff.
FWIW, I would find the ability to run stuff from the prompt useful for
debugging plpgsql functions. Rather than
edit function def
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ...
you could just edit in-place and test.
Of course having the ability to execute arbitrary plpgsql in .sql
scripts would be handy in some cases as well, though as others pointed
out there are alternatives.
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-12-27 17:45:07|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup|
|Previous:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2005-12-27 17:07:29|
|Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and|