| From: | Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Albert Cervera Areny <albert(at)sedifa(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance problems with 8.1.1 compared to 7.4.7 |
| Date: | 2005-12-27 18:56:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20051227125656.5d138645.frank@wiles.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:02:17 +0100
Albert Cervera Areny <albert(at)sedifa(dot)com> wrote:
> Are there any "rules of thumb" to let a begginer give reasonable
> values to these parameters? Not only work_mem, but also
> random_page_cost, and so on. Are there any tests one can run to
> determine "good" values?
>
Hi Albert,
There are several online sites that have information related to
tuning parameters. Here is a list of a few of them:
http://revsys.com/writings/postgresql-performance.html
http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html
http://www.powerpostgresql.com/Docs
http://www.powerpostgresql.com/PerfList
Hope these help!
---------------------------------
Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
http://www.wiles.org
---------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Stone | 2005-12-27 19:05:16 | Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? |
| Previous Message | Albert Cervera Areny | 2005-12-27 18:02:17 | Re: Performance problems with 8.1.1 compared to 7.4.7 |