Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WAL sync behaviour

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL sync behaviour
Date: 2005-11-10 14:43:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:25:35PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>Ah, yes, I forgot -- it's ext3. We're considering simply moving the WAL onto
>a separate partition (with data=writeback and noatime) if that can help us

There's no reason to use a journaled filesystem for the wal. Use ext2 in
preference to ext3.

Mike Stone

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2005-11-10 15:16:10
Subject: Re: Some help on buffers and other performance tricks
Previous:From: Steinar H. GundersonDate: 2005-11-10 14:25:35
Subject: Re: WAL sync behaviour

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group