| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so |
| Date: | 2005-11-03 17:26:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20051103172603.GB8246@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Is this an appropriate commit for post-Beta? Does it fix a critical bug
> that will prevent a release from happening? :(
Well, I asked -hackers before committing, and there were no objections,
plus there were a couple of messages that weren't actual encouragements
but I took as sign of approval.
The patch itself is pretty innocuous. I will keep an eye on the
buildfarm in case it causes any problems. It doesn't fix a bug in Pg
proper, but it allows PL/php to build.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-03 17:34:03 | pgsql: Fix the recently-added code that eliminates unnecessary |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-11-03 17:17:33 | Re: pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mark | 2005-11-03 17:28:02 | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-11-03 17:24:01 | Re: Exclusive lock for database rename |