| From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql general list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Installation trouble -- oops |
| Date: | 2005-10-31 16:00:17 |
| Message-ID: | 200510310800.17603.scrawford@pinpointresearch.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Saturday 29 October 2005 22:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:
> > Is postgresql (or some parts thereof) now using relative pathing
> > and has that behavior changed?
>
> As of 8.0 we attempt to determine the libdir, sharedir etc as
> relative to the location of the executable. So you can't just "cp"
> the PG executables to somewhere else without also copying the
> associated support files into parallel directories. I believe
> symlinking the executables will work fine though (ie, we look
> through the symlink before doing the relative-path calculation).
Yes, the symlinking did appear to work fine. Thanks for the
confirmation that it is an acceptable option.
Cheers,
Steve
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-10-31 16:11:00 | Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT) |
| Previous Message | Richard_D_Levine | 2005-10-31 15:54:31 | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? |