Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Keep in mind that the addition of the interval_justify_hours() did
> > generate some regression test changes, so removing
> > interval_justify_hours() might just take the results back to what we had
> > in 8.0.
> Not hardly. I tried already. The existing timestamp_mi behavior is
> probably as close to 8.0 as we can get given the change in underlying
You mean the '6432 hours' is a worse change, OK.
> > I guess my point is that we are changing 8.0.X behavior so we better be
> > sure it is now the way we want it to remain.
> [ shrug... ] We've changed datetime behavior in every past release,
> we're changing it for 8.1, we'll probably change it some more for 8.2,
> and again after that. All the datetime code is a work in progress.
> Get used to it.
OK, as long as we are sure we are not going to change it back to 8.0
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2005-10-26 15:26:55|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-10-26 15:07:58|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals |
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Telin Lin||Date: 2005-10-26 15:21:37|
|Subject: Re: BUG #2001: Signal 11 after concurrent inserts + updates|
|Previous:||From: Seneca Cunningham||Date: 2005-10-26 15:13:11|
|Subject: Re: BUG #1999: contrib/spi doesn't receive the configured|