Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Klint Gore <kg(at)kgb(dot)une(dot)edu(dot)au>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nicholas <hb(at)x256(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals
Date: 2005-10-25 13:23:03
Message-ID: 200510251323.j9PDN3j29126@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, what about 1.5 * '1 day'. By my logic multiplication and division
> > were by definition imprecise. Is the logic that we spill down only for
> > non-integral values?
>
> Right. Interval multiplication has always spilled fractional months
> over to seconds, but never the reverse. We have to have that same
> policy now for fractional days.

OK, I think that makes sense.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-10-25 14:27:51 Re: BUG #1998: transaction locks parent record when it shouldn't
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-25 13:14:12 Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-25 13:24:04 Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-25 13:14:12 Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals