Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Feedback from LinuxWorld, London

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org,Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Feedback from LinuxWorld, London
Date: 2005-10-10 20:42:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, David Fetter wrote:

> In this case, it might be easier to make a writeable VIEW with two 
> tables underneath and an appropriate call to ARRAY() and maybe to 
> array_to_string()

Is there any work being done on UPDATEABLE VIEWs?  I found, at one point, 
a 'work around' for it, but just wondering if there is any work being done 
on a more 'native' method ...

>> That was actually the context of the enum discussion.  I threw enum
>> out as an example and everyone latched onto it, missing the overall
>> point of trying to improve migration from MySQL.
> I didn't :)

I did, only as an example ... the question, on my part, being how many 
things could we 'mask', not so much focusing on enum itself :)

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-10-10 21:19:02
Subject: Re: Feedback from LinuxWorld, London
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-10-10 20:40:31
Subject: Re: Feedback from LinuxWorld, London

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group