On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 05:48:55PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 21. August 2005 01:48 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > One thing that occurred to me is that we might be able to simplify the
> > problem by adopting a project standard that all NLS message files shall
> > be in UTF8, period. Then we only have one encoding name to figure out
> > rather than N. Maybe this doesn't help much ...
> I suppose this would then break NLS on Windows, no?
We now have a patch to handle UTF-8 on Windows, via recoding to UTF-16
and back, so I guess not (not sure though). It would manage to annoy me
as a translator, but nothing too serious really.
Alvaro Herrera -- Valdivia, Chile Architect, www.EnterpriseDB.com
"Escucha y olvidars; ve y recordars; haz y entenders" (Confucio)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew - Supernews||Date: 2005-09-01 16:58:00|
|Subject: Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas|
|Previous:||From: Patrick Welche||Date: 2005-09-01 16:41:34|
|Subject: upgrade path / versioning roles|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-09-01 16:49:32|
|Subject: Re: sum(int4)/sum(int2) improvement |
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2005-09-01 16:31:55|
|Subject: Re: Version number in psql banner|