Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>,Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time
Date: 2005-08-31 19:58:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:43:45PM +0000, Matt Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com> writes:
> > > I don't remember the last time I intended to write code that referenced
> > > something that did not exist in the database.
> > 
> > Almost every day, people try to write stuff like
> > 
> > 	CREATE TEMP TABLE foo ... ;
> > 	INSERT INTO foo ... ;
> > 	etc etc
> > 	DROP TABLE foo ;
> Point taken.
> PL/SQL requires all DDL to be dynamic SQL.  For example:
> 	execute immediate 'drop table foo';

BTW, the way you handled this case in DB2 was:


This way the object you wanted did exist when you were creating the
function. Of course it would be better if plpgsql could just read the
DDL and deal with it... but I'd say that doing the CREATE TABLE outside
the statement is better than nothing.

Actually, I think you only had to do the CREATE TEMP TABLE outside the
function creation if the function didn't create the temp table itself.
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software        512-569-9461

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2005-08-31 19:59:56
Subject: Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time
Previous:From: Matt MillerDate: 2005-08-31 19:43:45
Subject: Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group