| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: PSQL commands not backwards-compatible |
| Date: | 2005-08-30 22:49:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200508310049.05521.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> This isn't a bug, it's a feature request. We've never had backwards
> compatibility of psql backslash commands.
In the past, most of these usually worked. As it appears now, most of
them won't work at all, so we should really put a bigger warning sign
somewhere, because in spite of this not being a bug, people will
probably consider it so and keep bothering us about it.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-30 22:56:37 | Re: PSQL commands not backwards-compatible |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-08-30 20:29:33 | Re: PSQL commands not backwards-compatible |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-30 22:56:37 | Re: PSQL commands not backwards-compatible |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-08-30 20:29:33 | Re: PSQL commands not backwards-compatible |