Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method

From: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Date: 2005-08-29 15:19:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:27:35 -0500
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:45:38PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > So the short answer is possibly "You build the tests and we'll run 'em."
> Would some version of dbt2/3 work for this?

Yeah, trying...  On the larger system I'm using I'm not seeing much of a
performance difference but I'm looking for a way to see if we can
identify any benefit to bypassing the kernel cache.  I've been
re-arranging disks due to failures and trying to tweak a couple of
profiling things, but I'll try to get some data to share within a few


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-29 15:30:46
Subject: Re: 8.1beta, SunOS and shmget
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2005-08-29 15:18:56
Subject: Re: Win32 Thread safetyness

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group