Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Certification Available +Pronounce

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Robert Cleary <robert(dot)cleary(at)ul(dot)ie>,David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>,Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Certification Available +Pronounce
Date: 2005-08-25 16:45:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> If certifications are seen in a bad-light, I believe it's directly
> because people sell-out their principles, or just plain set-out to make
> cash.

Well, actually: you're asking a group of users and proponents of an OSS RDBMS 
that has no certifications, and until a few years ago wasn't supported by any 
large companies and didn't have any compliance certificates or major 
reference implementations, what they think of certifications.  What answer 
did you expect to get?

Serious hackers never like certifications; they see them as something that 
their boss is liable to waste their time making them take.  The people who 
like certifications will not generally be subscribed to this list.

> This might be a mad-idea, but if you can build an open-source DBMS,  why
> can't you build a certification by the same process?: open-source
> collaboration for its inception, elaboration, construction and deployment?

Well, first off, how would you keep the questions secret from potential 
test-takers?  Also, keep in mind that designing a good certification exam is 
a lot of work, like 1000 hours of work.  

I'm lazy ... I'd rather just let SRA do their thing.   ;-)

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Chris TraversDate: 2005-08-25 17:02:39
Subject: Re: Certification Available +Pronounce
Previous:From: Chris TraversDate: 2005-08-25 16:36:23
Subject: Re: Certification Available +Pronounce

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group