| From: | David <dbree(at)duo-county(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sean Davis <sdavis2(at)mail(dot)nih(dot)gov>, David <dbree(at)duo-county(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl |
| Date: | 2005-08-10 20:22:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20050810202214.GA1935@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:28:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go?
> >DBD::Pg is the way to go, for numerous reasons. DBI is very well
> >supported.
> DBI/DBD is also what Perl considers standard.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
Well, it's still unanimous, and coming from people who have my respect.
Spent yesterday reading the DBD::Pg mailing list. Now plan on studying
the manpages for DBD and for DBI. It shouldn't be much of a chore
rewriting what little I've done so far into DBI code.
Thanks again to everyone who replied. Maybe I've already said it, but I
thought I was seeing just what all of you have said, but just wasn't
sure.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jtv | 2005-08-11 07:06:37 | Re: Getting oid with libpq |
| Previous Message | John DeSoi | 2005-08-10 18:30:23 | Re: Connect to a PostgreSQL-Server by TCP/IP |