Re: A 2 phase commit weirdness

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:12:06AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> > Looking at the sequence, at least the relcache init file stuff looks if
> > not broken at least a bit heavy-handed...
>
> I was planning to change that ;-) ... using separate 2PC action records
> for the relcache init file actions would make it much better.

Hum, do you mean separate for 2PC only, or make'em completely separate
invalidation messages?

I fixed the problem I had -- it was very easy to make the messages get
processed locally. However strangeness can still happen. Consider:

create table foo ();

begin;
drop table foo;
prepare transaction 'foo';

Now any backend that tries to access table foo will block, because the
'foo' prepared transaction has acquired a lock on it. However the table
is still visible in the catalogs, as it should be. It can easily be
awakened by other backend doing

commit transaction 'foo';

But at awakening, the user will get this:

ERROR: relation 66002 deleted while still in use

This is ugly -- I don't think there is a way to get out of it.

Unrelated question: is it intended that the prepared transactions are
visible cross-database through pg_prepared_xacts?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"No single strategy is always right (Unless the boss says so)"
(Larry Wall)