Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 19:56:28
Message-ID: 200504041556.29798.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Monday 04 April 2005 12:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > ... If there are no license or build issues I'm in favor.
>
> Peter has pointed out that the problem of circular dependencies is a
> showstopper for integrating plPHP. The build order has to be
> Postgres
> PHP (since its existing DB support requires Postgres to build)
> plPHP
> so putting #1 and #3 into the same package is a no go. Which is too
> bad, but I see no good way around it.
>

AFAICT Peter's claim is false. You can install plphp in the order of PHP,
PostgreSQL,plPHP which is the same for all of the other pl's.

You don't need postgresql installed before php any more than you need it
installed for perl (although you do need postgresql installed to compile some
of the perl & php db interfaces, but that is all after the fact.)

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-04 20:01:29 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous Message John DeSoi 2005-04-04 18:28:21 Re: How to dump data from database?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-04 20:01:29 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-04-04 19:50:30 Re: _RollbackFunc : dead code?