Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BuildFarm status: recent check failures

From: "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BuildFarm status: recent check failures
Date: 2005-04-04 13:32:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Why doesn't the regression test set the timezone to GMT instead of PST.  I believe the horology test would just work then.


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:08:46 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm status: recent check failures 

> Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> writes:
> > Just a quick heads-up: I'm not sure of the cause, but it looks like 
> > something recent change to HEAD and REL8_0_STABLE is causing check 
> > failures on the buildfarm machines. A brief (and thoroughly naive) 
> > glance at the details shows a horology test failure.
> 			regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
------- End of Original Message -------

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-04-04 14:17:40
Subject: Re: Bug in DROP NOT NULL
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-04-04 10:16:00
Subject: DELETE ... USING

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group