Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Issue Tracking System (was add_missing_from in 8.1)

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issue Tracking System (was add_missing_from in 8.1)
Date: 2005-04-01 12:29:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > Wow, seems I lost that somehow.
> > 
> > BTW, I personally think it is fine for patch submitters to send
> "ping" 
> > mails if your patch is not applied or reviewed within a reasonable 
> > period of time --  this is standard practice among the GCC
> community, 
> > for example. I certainly have a tendency to lose track of the
> status of 
> > the various outstanding patches.
> Agreed, but I shouldn't have lost it.  They shouldn't _need_ to ping,
> and if they do, I hope I can saw we have it, rather than I don't. 
> :-(
If we have at least an Issue Tracking System, we didn't loose it. :-(
Recently I send a patch to Mantis BT to make it functional in
PostgreSQL. Does someone use/try it? 

Euler Taveira de Oliveira

Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger 

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marian POPESCUDate: 2005-04-01 14:05:51
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Previous:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2005-04-01 12:08:54
Subject: Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group