From: | Enrico Weigelt <weigelt(at)metux(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: cast not IMMUTABLE? |
Date: | 2005-03-24 13:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 20050324131552.GB19555@nibiru.borg.metux.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > why that cast is not considered IMMUTABLE ?
>
> Because it depends on your TimeZone setting. Observe:
BTW: whats really the difference between timezone and
timezonetz ? I always used to use timestamp (w/o tz) and
thought timestamptz was just an question of presentation.
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact(at)metux(dot)de
cellphone: +49 174 7066481
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- Webshops --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-03-24 13:38:22 | Re: cast not IMMUTABLE? |
Previous Message | Enrico Weigelt | 2005-03-24 13:03:20 | public key authentification |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-03-24 13:38:22 | Re: cast not IMMUTABLE? |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-03-24 12:35:35 | Re: more detailed timing ? |