|From:||Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Manual vs automatic functionality|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 11:05:32AM -0500, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
> Being able to assign "hints" to queries may be able to allow DBAs to tune
> queries in tables who's characteristics are misrepresented by the
> statistics in ANALYZE.
I wouldn't mind being able to provide hints to the planner. For
example, I have some set-returning functions that typically return
10-100 rows and I usually have a good idea of how many rows a
particular set of inputs will generate, and sometimes I know other
characteristics about those rows as well. But the planner, not
knowing any better, always assumes the functions will return 1000
rows, which presumably affects the plan, sometimes for the worse.
Here's an example of a problem I've had:
I've wondered if the ability to provide hints about the expected
output from set-returning functions would be useful.
|Next Message||Alex||2005-03-05 17:56:16||Explicit Transaction Priority|
|Previous Message||pgsql||2005-03-05 16:05:32||Manual vs automatic functionality|