Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: logging as inserts

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Subject: Re: logging as inserts
Date: 2005-03-03 23:43:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Incidentally, the fly in this particular pot of ointment is that we
> potentially log a lot more than just statements.

Oh, yeah, but just about anything can be put in the "statement" field; errors, 
disconnects, etc.    

Hmmm ... though we don't currently apply "log line prefix" to those, do we?

> Incidentally, %$ doesn't tstrike me as ideal - to conform to the way the
> rest are done we should use an alphabetic character, not $.

Sorry, I'm being perlish ;-)


Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-03-04 00:08:13
Subject: Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-03-03 22:45:29
Subject: Re: logging as inserts

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group