Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Markus Bertheau ?" <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>,dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk, oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com, zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode
Date: 2005-03-03 05:20:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> The correct encoding name is "UTF-8".
> > True, but Peter says the ANSI standard calls it UTF8 so that's what I
> > used.
> What SQL99 actually says is
>          -  UTF8 specifies the name of a character repertoire that consists
>             of every character represented by The Unicode Standard Version
>             2.0 and by ISO/IEC 10646 UTF-8, where each character is encoded
>             using the UTF-8 encoding, occupying from 1 (one) through 6
>             octets.
> That is, "UTF8" is an identifier chosen to refer to an encoding which
> they know perfectly well is really called UTF-8.  We should probably
> follow the same convention of using UTF8 in code identifiers and UTF-8
> in documentation.  In particular, UTF_8 with an underscore is sanctioned
> by nobody and should be avoided.

OK, new version with utf_8 changed to utf8.  The docs mention UTF-8 when
talking about the encoding, but UTF8 when listing the code to use.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2005-03-03 05:57:20
Subject: Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-03-03 04:50:04
Subject: Re: Vacuum time degrading

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2005-03-03 05:36:04
Subject: Display Pg buffer cache (WIP)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-03-03 04:44:00
Subject: Re: WIP: buffer manager rewrite (take 2)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group