Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent

From: Michael Adler <adler(at)pobox(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
Subject: Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Date: 2005-03-02 18:45:15
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 07:21:41AM -0800, Mark Wong wrote:
> Ah, ok.  I've reapplied the 2Q patch to CVS from 20050301:
> I ran it for 3 hours, just in case, and the charts suggest it flattens
> out after 2 hours.

Looking at the "Response Time Charts" 


20050301 with 2Q patch

It seems like the average response time has gone down, but the worse
case ceiling has raised about 35%.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-03-02 20:15:54
Subject: Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Previous:From: WesDate: 2005-03-02 18:36:01
Subject: Re: Vacuum time degrading

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group