Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Ah, the problem was introduced here:
>
> Right, it was my fault.
>
> > The problem is that the PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL call was moved
> > below the printf 64-bit tests. This commited patch moves
> > PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL which is after we know AC_TRY_RUN works and
> > just before printf 64-bit args are tested.
>
> This patch breaks things in a different way: you should not have moved
> the AC_LIBOBJ(snprintf) step. Also you randomly placed the arg-control
> test between a chunk of code and the comment describing same.

Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073