From: | elein(at)varlena(dot)com (elein) |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | SF PostgreSQL <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Call for vote, next meeting location |
Date: | 2005-02-26 00:41:27 |
Message-ID: | 20050226004127.GE10213@varlena.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | sfpug |
C. However, I would like very much to continue meeting
in the east bay as well as the city.
--elein
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:15:09AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Early on for SFPUG, we decided to alternate meetings between SF and
> Berkeley/Oakland, because our membership is spread out over the Bay Area.
>
> However, I can't help but notice that attendance at the SF meetings has been
> significantly higher than the Oakland meetings, by a factor of 2, for the
> last year. This is probably because we do not have a meeting location
> within easy reach of BART in the East Bay.
>
> Therefore, I would like to take a vote. Please pick either A, B, C, or D
> below:
>
> A. I will attend the March 9 meeting if it is in San Francisco at Hyperic or
> ShareChive, but NOT if it is at Casa Donde in Oakland.
>
> B. I will attend the March 9 meeting if it is at Casa Donde in Oakland, but
> NOT at a location in San Francisco.
>
> C. I will attend the meeting regardless of location.
>
> D. I will NOT attend the meeting regardless of location.
>
> Of course, if someone offered us a meeting location near BART in
> Berkely/Oakland then this discussion could be mooted. Hey, UCB folks,
> perhaps you could book us a meeting room?
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | craiga | 2005-02-26 00:54:34 | Re: Call for vote, next meeting location |
Previous Message | Fred Moyer | 2005-02-25 23:38:46 | Re: Call for vote, next meeting location |