Thank you! I will have the client try that. What
about the event_tbl_evt_id_key index question. Could
that also be causing me difficulties? Should I
periodically reindex it?
--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bill Chandler <billybobc1210(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Update processes run continually throughout the
> day in
> > which rows are inserted but none deleted.
> What about row updates?
> > Even seemingly simple commands are taking forever.
> > For example:
> > select evt_id from event_tbl where evt_id=1;
> > takes over a minute to complete.
> Since evt_id is a bigint, you need to write that as
> select evt_id from event_tbl where evt_id=1::bigint;
> or various other locutions that have the same
> effect. What you have is
> a bigint-vs-int comparison, which is not indexable
> in releases before 8.0.
> The same problem is occurring in your other example.
> regards, tom lane
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2005-01-31 20:09:31|
|Subject: Re: Automagic tuning|
|Previous:||From: PFC||Date: 2005-01-31 18:14:48|
|Subject: Re: Performance degredation at client site|