| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering | 
| Date: | 2005-01-28 15:29:58 | 
| Message-ID: | 20050128152958.GA9076@phlogiston.dyndns.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance | 
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Hervé Piedvache wrote:
> 
> I don't insist about have data in RAM .... but when you use PostgreSQL with 
> big database you know that for quick access just for reading the index file 
> for example it's better to have many RAM as possible ... I just want to be 
> able to get a quick access with a growing and growind database ...
Well, in any case, you need much better hardware than you're looking
at.  I mean, dual Xeon with 2 Gig isn't hardly big iron.  Why don't
you try benchmarking on a honking big box -- IBM P690 or a big Sun
(I'd counsel against that, though) or something like that?  Or even
some Opterons.  Dual Xeon is probablt your very worst choice at the
moment.
A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Information security isn't a technological problem.  It's an economics
problem.
		--Bruce Schneier
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-01-28 15:31:38 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering | 
| Previous Message | Pallav Kalva | 2005-01-28 15:15:50 | Poor Performance on Postgres 8.0 |