Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgdump

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>,Enrico <scotty(at)linuxtime(dot)it>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgdump
Date: 2005-01-17 04:42:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 16:24 +0100, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> >
> Looks good, except for some minor code cleanups and doc updates. Barring
> any objections, I'll clean it up and apply it once we branch 8.0. I
> suppose for consistency we ought to allow multiple schemas to be
> specified via the "-n" option?

I don't remember this patch.  How is it related to the other pg_dump
patches in the 8.1 pathces queue?

> (Speaking of which, is the plan still to branch 8.0 very shortly after
> the 8.0.0 final release?)

I guess we could do that now actually.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:22:55 from Neil Conway


  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:59:50 from Neil Conway

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-01-17 04:59:50
Subject: Re: pgdump
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-01-17 04:22:55
Subject: Re: pgdump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group