From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster) |
Date: | 2005-01-13 22:42:33 |
Message-ID: | 20050113224233.GA61555@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 05:05:00PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz> writes:
> >> And?
> >>
> >> (ie, what test case are you talking about?)
>
> > This test is function for searching max factor. It is speaking only about
> > quality of interpret an language. I would ask why?
>
> So I can replicate your test.
SELECT delitel(1000000, 1);
Mean times over the last five of six runs on my poor 500MHz FreeBSD
4.11-PRERELEASE box:
6741 ms 7.4.6 (from FreeBSD ports collection)
14427 ms 8.0.0rc5 (from CVS source)
I remembered that I had build 8.0.0rc5 with --enable-debug so I
rebuilt it without that option, not sure if that would make a
difference. The mean time increased by 8% to 15580 ms, which was
opposite from what I expected. I re-ran the 7.4.6 tests and they
came out the same as they had before.
I'm not sure what optimization flags (if any) the ports build of
7.4.6 might have used. I can take a closer look if you think it
matters.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-01-13 23:06:23 | Re: sparse (static analyzer) report |
Previous Message | Palle Girgensohn | 2005-01-13 22:17:40 | Re: Bug? 8.0 does not use partial index |