Re: pgsql: get_names_for_var didn't do recursion for

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: get_names_for_var didn't do recursion for
Date: 2005-01-13 21:40:24
Message-ID: 200501132140.j0DLeOq02131@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > With the several backend related changes that have gone in over the past
> > couple of days, are we looking at an RC6? :(
>
> Nothing that I've put in seems significant enough to need an RC6. The
> only recent patch that really has any risk of destabilization is the one
> that caused RC5 (the SMgr hashtable backlink stuff). I'd prefer to see
> people go full bore on testing RC5 than spend time updating to a new RC.

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message User Mha 2005-01-13 22:19:09 pginstaller - pginst: Use LoginUser() and CreateProcessAsUser() when the
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-01-13 21:24:50 pgsql: Translation updates