| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Grammer Cleanup |
| Date: | 2004-12-29 17:39:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20041229173916.GA10437@ns.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > Small patch to clean up the grammer a bit by adding 'GroupId',
> > 'SchemaName' and 'SavePointId'.
>
> I don't particularly see the value of this --- especially since the
> direction of future development is likely to be to remove the
> distinction between user and group names, rather than make it stronger.
Alright, I can redo it w/ UserId in place of GroupId everywhere. I'd
like your comment on the 'pg_class changes for group ownership' on
-hackers, which might play into these changes too. Previously 'GRANT'
had 'ColId' instead of either, which isn't really appropriate there...
Do you agree with the other changes (ColId -> SchemaName, ColId ->
SavePointId) ?
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-29 17:50:31 | Re: Grammer Cleanup |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-29 17:29:39 | Re: Grammer Cleanup |