Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: locales and encodings on Windows

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: locales and encodings on Windows
Date: 2004-12-22 17:25:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote on 22.12.2004 13:14:
> >>> [about PG not supporting Unicode on Windows]
> >> 
> >> PostgreSQL uses the OS functinos to do locale handling. The other
> >> databases usually implement their own (or use a library that does it,
> >> but they do not rely on the OS)
> > Being a developer myself I can understand this reason, but in the PG 
> > context I'm a User I not having Unicode support is my eyes a very big 
> > deficiency which gives the whole Win32 a semi-professional "touch".
> > Unicode is something very important and I do hope this will be solved in on 
> > of the next releases.
> [ shrug... ]  It can't be too important to Windows users, since their
> platform doesn't support it.

And what solution options do we have?  Is bundling our own Unicode
library something we even want to consider?  I would think not.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to


pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-12-22 17:28:03
Subject: Re: locales and encodings on Windows
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-12-22 17:21:47
Subject: Re: locales and encodings on Windows

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group