Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FAQ and Windows

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net
Subject: Re: FAQ and Windows
Date: 2004-11-27 05:19:46
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
OK, I updated the FAQ by adding this sentence:

	MSDOS-based versions of Windows (Win95, Win98, WinMe) can run
	PostgreSQL using Cygwin.

I also updated the version number.

Magnus is going to update the pginstaller FAQ to talk about using Win32
and I am going to have the CVS Win32 FAQ talk about building on Win32,
and each FAQ is going to point to the other.  Magnus, FAQ_MINGW already
points to the pginstaller FAQ.  Can we complete the adjustement of these


Ian Barwick wrote:
> Hi
> I was trying to clarify the installation options for Windows and noticed
> all mention of the Cygwin package has been dropped from the FAQ.
> Attached is a patch mentioning this is the only option
> for DOS-based Windows (95 ~ ME) - someone is bound to ask - and with links to 
> the relevant FAQs. I also bumped the current version number.
> On a related note I'd suggest adding the "Native Win32 FAQ"
> ( ) to the
> list at .
> Ian Barwick
> barwick(at)gmx(dot)net

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Kenneth TanzerDate: 2004-11-27 20:56:09
Subject: Section, Regular Expression Matching Rules
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-26 23:39:16
Subject: Re: Regexp matching: bug or operator error?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group