Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>,Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Date: 2004-11-13 17:45:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>> It is never the fault of a programming language per se. People with a good 
>> understanding of object design will write "object oriented code" in every 
>> language, even assembler. People who just don't know what they are doing 
>> will write bad code, and the best Pascal compiler in the world won't be 
>> able to prevent that.
> Yes but I believe even you would agree that their are programming languages 
> that are better for certain tasks than others. The use of java as a 
> replication engine for PostgreSQL seems, well... incorrect.

We definitely concur with that, which is why we are re-writing it ... 
going to Java, as Andrew has mentioned, was *not* a design decision that 
we made, but was made for us :(

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-11-13 19:58:00
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-11-13 17:06:44
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group